header-logo header-logo

21 February 2008
Issue: 7309 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

Statwatch

Education, Judicial Committee, Controlled Drugs

Education (Student Support) (Amendment) Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/235) Commence 28 February 2008. Provide that a student who is a prisoner during any part of the academic year is not eligible for any part of the full-time student support package, with the exception of tuition fee support and  disabled students’ allowance.

 

Judicial Committee (General Appellate Jurisdiction) Rules (Amendment) Order 2008 (SI 2008/300) Commences 4 March 2008. Omits the current requirement for the parties to examine the proofs of the record and the corresponding fee. The record means the aggregate of papers relating to an appeal proper (including the pleadings, proceedings, evidence, judgments and order granting leave to appeal) to be laid before Her Majesty in council on the hearing of the appeal. The parties will prepare the record and then send it to the registry for approval. The registrar may, if necessary, give directions for it to be rearranged. Once the record has been approved by the registry it is then reproduced by the appellant who is required to send a number of copies to the registry and to the other parties.

 

Controlled Drugs (Drug Precursors) (Community External Trade) Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/296) Commence on 7 March 2008. Implement Council Reg 111/2005/EC, which imposes obligations on operators in respect of the documentation, recording and labelling of substances useful for the manufacture of controlled drugs, known as drug precursors(scheduled substances). It requires: operators engaged in  the export or import or in intermediary activities involving scheduled substances to have a licence; and operators to notify the competent authorities about any circumstances which suggest that scheduled substances intended for import, export or intermediary activities might be diverted for the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll