header-logo header-logo

31 January 2008
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Statwatch

Legal updates

Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (Addi­tional Authorities) Order 2008 (SI 2008/78) Commences 15 February 2008 Extends the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, s 17, which puts a duty on named agencies to consider the implications for crime, disorder and substance misuse as they carry out their business, to cover in addition the Greater London Authority, Transport for London and the London Development Agency. This is to ensure they take account of crime, disorder, substance misuse, anti-social behaviour, and behaviour adversely affecting the envi­ronment, in all their business.

 

School Admission Appeals Code (Appointed Day) (England) Order 2008 (SI 2008/53) Commenced 17 January 2008 Appointed 17 January 2008 as the day on which the School Admission Appeals Code, issued under the School Standards and Framework Act 1998, ss 84, 85, by the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Fami­lies, came into force. The new code applies only in relation to England and imposes requirements and includes guidelines setting out aims, objec­tives and other matters in relation to the arrangements for appeals against decisions about admission of children to schools.

 

UK Borders Act 2007 (Commence­ment No 1 and Transitional Provi­sions) Order 2008 (SI 2008/99) Commenced 31 January 2008 Provisions including those relating to immigration officers’ powers of arrest and detention, and biometric registra­tion for those subject to immigration control, commenced on 31 January 2008. Also confers a power to make regulations to require those subject to immigration control to apply for a docu­ment recording external physical char­acteristics and to require a “biometric immigration document” to be used for specified immigration purposes, in connection with specified immigration procedures, and in specified circum­stances where a question arises about a person’s status in relation to national­ity or immigration. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll