header-logo header-logo

07 August 2024
Issue: 8083 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Fees
printer mail-detail

Statutory bills or conditional fee agreements?

A Georgian billionaire can challenge his legal fees, the Court of Appeal has held

Bidzina Ivanishvili has been suing Credit Suisse in several jurisdictions for alleged mismanagement of his assets. Law firm Signature Litigation was instructed to act as global coordinating counsel of the litigation.

All 79 invoices rendered by the firm, totalling nearly £13m, have been paid. The case, Signature Litigation v Bidzina Ivanishvili [2024] EWCA Civ 901, turned on whether those invoices were ‘interim statutory bills’, as defined by s 70 of the Solicitors Act 1974. If so, time limits applied and the bill could not be assessed.

The invoices were for 65% of the standard fee, with the remaining 35% together with an uplift fee and success fee only due if certain contingencies were achieved. These were held not to be ‘interim statutory bills’.

Lord Justice Coulson said: ‘Solicitors sensibly seek interim payments, but they still want the protection of s 70, even under CFAs [conditional fee agreements]. As the authorities demonstrate, they make uneasy bedfellows.’

Issue: 8083 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Fees
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll