header-logo header-logo

Statistics point to a healthy bench

01 March 2018
Issue: 7783 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Judges rarely get ill, with considerably fewer sick days recorded compared to the average for civil servants, according to evidence supplied by the judiciary to the Senior Salaries Review Board. No Court of Appeal judge has taken a sick day in the past two years. Similarly, no Recorder, Judge Advocate or Deputy Judge Advocate has taken a day off sick in the past two years. Seven High Court judges took a total of 393 days off in 2016/17 but no sick days are recorded for 2015/2016. Circuit Judges had suffered the most—156 judges took 3,079 days off in 2015/16 and 185 judges were ill on 3,410 days in 2016/17. In total, across the judiciary, 9,965 days were lost due to sickness absence last year, and 9, 321 in 2015/16.

Issue: 7783 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll