header-logo header-logo

Statements of truth

20 January 2009 / Janna Purdie
Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Janna Purdie highlights the importance of ensuring witnesses understand the consequences of providing false information supported by a statement of truth
 

Statements of truth
Statements of truth must not be regarded as a mere formality. Yet in practice do practitioners clearly explain the consequences of giving false information supported by a statement of truth? Certainly in the case of KJM Motorbikes v Hinton, which came before the Court of Appeal last week, the answer would appear to be no.

In that case, the Court of Appeal emphasised the importance of making witnesses aware of the dangers they face in such circumstances. Th e witness’s contempt of court had been deemed serious by the first instance court but permission for contempt of court proceedings were unsuccessful as the judge’s view was that such proceedings would not benefi t the administration of justice. Th e Court of Appeal disagreed. In its judgment, which all practitioners should take note of, it is clear that courts should, in the future, take a more stringent line in deciding whether to grant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll