header-logo header-logo

State of play

17 April 2015 / Frances Ratcliffe
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_april_17_ratclife

The latest developments in property cohabitation cases: where are we now, asks Frances Ratcliffe

In Stack v Dowden [2007] 2 AC 432, [2007] 2 All ER 929, the majority of the House of Lords disavowed the relevance of the presumption of resulting trust in cases concerning the beneficial interests in real property registered in the joint names of cohabitating couples for their joint occupation for domestic purposes. Rather, in the words of Baroness Hale, the search is to ascertain the parties’ shared intentions, actual, inferred or imputed with respect to the property in the light of their whole course of conduct in relation to it. Stack reiterated that the starting point in considering the apportionment of beneficial interests is that equity follows the law: so, in cases of sole legal ownership, the starting point is sole beneficial ownership, and in cases of joint legal ownership it is joint beneficial ownership. Moreover, cases of joint legal ownership where the beneficial interests are not shared equally will be “very unusual”. Stack was itself such a case,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll