header-logo header-logo

Staking a claim: contesting a will

24 September 2020 / Chris Williams
Issue: 7903 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
28047
Chris Williams discusses a court’s approach to a 1975 Act claim

In brief

  • Re H (deceased) SH v NH and another [2020] EWHC 1134 (Fam): a 1975 Act claim against an estate for reasonable financial provision.

In Re H (deceased) SH v NH and another [2020] EWHC 1134 (Fam), [2020] All ER (D) 86 (May) the claimant (C) made a 1975 Act claim against the estate of her late father (F) (who died in 2016) for reasonable financial provision. F’s estate was calculated at £554,000, being F’s half share of the property owned jointly with his wife (£350,000), a half share in joint accounts with his wife (£63,000) and the executor’s account (£141,000).

The defendants were C’s mother (D1) and C’s brother (D2), as executor of his late father’s estate.

  • C and D2 were the only children of the marriage and D1 was the sole beneficiary of F’s estate.
  • D1 was aged 80, had extensive health problems, was profoundly deaf, lived in a care home
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll