header-logo header-logo

29 August 2023
Issue: 8038 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Human rights
printer mail-detail

‘Staggering’ asylum claim delays

Thousands of asylum seekers are mired in a claims process beset by delays, backlogs and mistakes, according to the latest Home Office statistics.

The quarterly statistics, published last week, show an increase in the number of people waiting longer than six months for an initial decision on their asylum claim, from 89,231 in June 2022 to 139,691 in June 2023.

The Home Office was dealing with 134,046 cases—a record high. This figure, taking dependants into account, corresponded to a total of 174,457 people waiting for an initial decision on their asylum claim—a number described as ‘staggering’ by Richard Atkinson, Law Society deputy vice president.

Atkinson said: ‘These figures show the growing backlog is due to inefficiency and under resourcing of the asylum system.

‘The best way to bring down the backlog and reduce the cost to the taxpayer is to properly resource and train Home Office caseworkers to ensure sufficient and good quality decision-making.’

The statistics show 71% of applications were recognised as refugees at initial decision. Of those decisions appealed, 53% were overturned.

The figures also show the number of decisions withdrawn by the Home Office has more than doubled; a withdrawn case means the Home Office will no longer consider it and a claimant will not receive a decision, either of refugee status or a refusal. The Home Office withdrew 11,396 out of 24,000 decisions in the first six months of 2023. In comparison, there were 3,366 withdrawal decisions in the last six months of 2022.

Atkinson said: ‘The government updated its guidance to expand the circumstances in which a claim will be considered withdrawn.

‘It is not yet clear whether the increase in withdrawals is a result of the policy change and crucially, whether those affected are aware of these changes and the impact they can have on their claim being withdrawn.’

The Home Office maintains it will clear the backlog by the end of 2023, fulfilling a government commitment. The Illegal Migration Act 2023, which passed into law in July, creates a duty to remove persons arriving by an unauthorised route, regardless of any asylum claim.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll