header-logo header-logo

SRA & LSB heads to step down

05 March 2025
Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail
Paul Philip, chief executive of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), is to retire this year after 11 years in the role, as soon as a replacement is hired.

Speaking last week, Philip said: ‘I am proud of the progress we have made. After so long at the helm, this feels like the right time to retire and switch pace.’

Thanking Philip for the ‘major contribution he has made to the SRA’, Anna Bradley, SRA chair, said: ‘He will be a hard act to follow’.

Alan Kershaw, chair of the Legal Services Board (LSB), has also stepped down from his role, due to personal considerations. Catherine Brown, the LSB’s senior independent director, will take over until the Ministry of Justice recruits a successor.

Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll