header-logo header-logo

22 May 2015 / Sian Thompson
Issue: 7653 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Square pegs in round holes

nlj_7653_thompson

The introduction of LLPs & ABSs has had unforeseen consequences for professional executors, says Sian Thompson

For over a century the legal structure of law firms was confined to sole practitioners and partnerships. When change arrived it has been recent and fast paced—in legal chronological terms at least:

  • 1890 The Partnership Act
  • 2001 Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) introduced
  • 2007 Alternate Business Structures (ABS) came into existence

Unsurprisingly, elements of the administration connected to these new forms of legal services have struggled to keep up with the legislative reforms.

The probate registry is no exception to this. The impact of LLPs upon probate practitioners was not addressed by the courts until 2006. An LLP is a legal personality separate from its members, but many standard will clauses appoint “the partners in the firm of”. Such was the will prepared in 1992 for Edith Rogers.

By the time of her death in 2003 her chosen law firm had merged to become part of an LLP. The Bristol Probate Registry refused to issue

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll