header-logo header-logo

22 June 2011
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Speedy libel

A not-for-profit arbitration scheme has been launched for libel disputes.

Early Resolution – the brainchild of Sir Charles Gray, a retired high court judge, and Alastair Brett, a former legal manager of The Times – aims to help parties cut costs by dealing with key issues at an early stage. It aims to increase access to justice at reasonable cost irrespective of an individual’s financial means.

A high-profile roster of legal professionals have signed up to act as arbitrators, including retired Court of Appeal judges, Sir Henry Brooke and Sir Brian Neill, former Bar chair, Desmond Browne QC, and Doughty Street’s Heather Rogers QC.

Early Resolution aims to resolve disputes within 28 days, with initial costs unlikely to exceed £2,500 plus VAT.

Brett said: “The object of the exercise is to make the cost of libel actions infinitely cheaper. We believe we can offer that by deciding on ‘meaning’ on day one, so the defendant can decide whether to stand up and defend or make an offer of amends...This gives access to justice who people who think they have a prima facie case.”

Issue: 7471 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll