header-logo header-logo

A sorry state of affairs

The UK must up its game in the fight against corruption after the disastrous BAE/Saudi corruption investigation, says Stephen Baker

The decision by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) to drop its investigation into BAE's relationship with Saudi Arabia re Al Yamamah had a significant adverse impact upon the international standing of the UK. Serious questions were asked within the international community as to whether there was a genuine commitment on behalf of the UK to combat corruption. The SFO appeared to have caved in at the first real sign of pressure from the Saudi authorities; indeed caved in to threats made by the man at the centre of the investigation. No attempt was made to reason with the Saudis so far as can be determined. No effort appears to have been made to explain that making such threats was not the British way of doing things. A white flag was simply raised.

Lord Justice Moses's decision in Corner House Research & Campaign Against Arms Trade, R (on the application of) v Director

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll