header-logo header-logo

11 October 2007
Issue: 7292 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Solicitors snap up indemnity bargains

News

Professional indemnity insurance rates for solicitors dropped this year—but experts have warned that such premium prices are not sustainable.
Sandra Neilson-Moore, European practice leader for law firms’ professional indemnity at Marsh, says the 1 October renewal deadline saw competition-driven reductions in rates for most law firms in England and Wales.
Top 100 firms saw drops of 10% or more, with their gross revenues allowing insurers to hold premiums relatively steady, while granting generous reductions in terms of rate on revenue. For smaller firms the competition was even keener.

Andrew Jackson, managing director in Marsh’s UK professional indemnity practice, says: “The singular renewal date is unique to the solicitors’ professional indemnity insurance market and, as a result, firms can achieve reduced premiums as the market strives to preserve its share in the closing days of the process.”

He adds, however, that these competitive pressures have resulted in significantly lower premiums which, although good news for firms, may not be sustainable in the longer term.

Frank Maher, a solicitor with Legal Risk, suspects these premium levels are not sustainable beyond next year at most.
“There are a lot of property and mortgage fraud related claims, and conveyancing firms seem to have forgotten the Law Society’s green and blue warning cards and the lessons learned from claims in the 90s which threatened to empty out the Solicitors Indemnity Fund.”

Some firms, he says, have been declined cover by leading insurers because of claims issues, forcing them to take specialist advice and place cover with insurers who would not otherwise have been their first choice.
“I believe the issue in a couple of years will not be one of price but whether some firms can even get cover at all,” he adds.

Issue: 7292 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll