header-logo header-logo

Solicitor

19 September 2013
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Barnaby v Raleys [2013] Lexis Citation 59, [2013] All ER (D) 63 (Sep)

It was established law that in order for a court to make a finding of professional negligence against a solicitor it would first have to be determined whether there had in fact been a breach of duty. Second, if there had been, the court had to then ask whether the breach caused or materially contributed to the claimant’s alleged loss. Third, the court had to decide if the claimant had lost something of value in the sense that his prospects of success were more than negligible. Fourth, if the court decided that the claimant had lost a claim with more than a negligible prospect of success, it had to make a realistic assessment of what those prospects of success were. Finally, the court would need to make an assessment of what the likely value of the claim was having taken account of the prospects of success.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll