header-logo header-logo

Solicitor

12 May 2017
Issue: 7745 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re Blavo; Blavo v Law Society (acting through the Solicitors Regulation Authority) [2017] EWHC 561 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 03 (May)

The Chancery Division ruled on a solicitor’s application to set aside statutory demands served by the Law Society in respect of the costs of an intervention into his practice. The solicitor had been, for regulatory purposes, the ‘manager’ of a company, through which legal services had been provided. The court rejected his contention that the effect of the Administration of Justice Act 1985 (the 1985 Act) was that, where a solicitor was a manager of a company, all powers of intervention against the solicitor personally, derived from the Solicitors Act 1974 (the 1974 Act), had been lost, and, that to that extent, the 1974 Act had been repealed. The court held that, on the true construction of para 32(1)(d)(iv) of Sch 2 to the 1985 Act, a manager of a recognised body was capable of having his or her own practice and it was not a ground for setting aside statutory demands. However, the statutory demands were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll