header-logo header-logo

Snakes & ladders

29 June 2012 / Anna Hughes
Issue: 7520 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury , Criminal
printer mail-detail
200532077-001_fmt1_4

Crime doesn’t pay out compensation, notes Anna Hughes

David Joyce and his uncle, Edward O’Brien, decided to relieve Raymond Armstrong of a set of ladders that were outside his property. The flaw in their otherwise fool-proof plan was that the ladders were too big for the Ford Transit van that belonged to O’Brien. Unwilling to let this detail hamper their plans, O’Brien and Joyce decided that the former should drive the van, while the latter stood on the back and held onto the ladders and the van door in order to stop the ladders falling out. On taking a sharp left hand turn at a junction, O’Brien managed to dislodge his nephew from the back of the van and the latter sustained severe head injuries. On 20 August 2010, O’Brien pleaded guilty to a charge of dangerous driving arising out of the accident.

Criminal capers

Joyce sought to recover damages for his injuries and proceedings were issued against O’Brien and his insurers. O’Brien played no part in defending the proceedings but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll