header-logo header-logo

Small claims matter

01 June 2018 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
nlj_7795_allen

All hail R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor & the Justice Select Committee, says Patrick Allen

The House of Commons Justice Select Committee has slammed government proposals to raise the small claims limit for personal injury claims in its recent forthright report (Small claims limit for personal injury, 17 May 2018).

The government had announced its intention to raise the small claims limit for general damages from £1,000 to £5,000 for claims arising from a road accident and £2,000 for other claims including accidents at work. It has just introduced the Civil Liability Bill in the House of Lords which would reduce whiplash damages to a small fraction of the Judicial Standards Board (JSB) guideline figures.

Legal costs are not recoverable in the small claims track so accident victims would not be able to instruct lawyers to help with their case, obtain medical evidence, advance court fees and value and negotiate the claim.

The Justice Select Committee received compelling evidence of the obstacles that litigants in person would face and concluded that ‘this would represent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll