header-logo header-logo

Slim election pickings for legal aid

23 April 2015
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Odds stacked against post-election renaissance for legal aid

The post-election outlook remains bleak for legal aid lawyers, whoever takes charge after next month’s general election.

Writing in NLJ this week, Steve Hynes, director of the Legal Action Group, notes that around £600m-£700m has been cut by the coalition government from the legal aid budget over this parliament. “The Conservatives seem committed to more cuts and former legal aid lawyer Sadiq Khan, the Labour Shadow Lord Chancellor, has made it clear that if they form the next government he will not be able to turn back the clock on all the changes to legal aid. Against this background the outlook does not appear optimistic for legal aid lawyers,” he says. Hynes notes that Justice Secretary Chris Grayling has decided to restart the tender process for criminal legal aid solicitors, while Labour has pledged to scrap the tenders if they make a return to government next month.

“This means legal aid firms still have to scurry to draft their tender applications by 5 May deadline, if they want to hedge their bets on the outcome of the election,” says Hynes.

Labour has agreed to look again at the 8.5% fee cut in criminal legal aid the current government plans for July. They will also reverse the changes to judicial review approved by Parliament last month, and have promised that “victims of domestic violence get the legal support they need to break free of violent relationships”. Meanwhile, the Lib Dems are committed to carrying out a review of civil legal aid, which could be included in a future coalition agreement.

David Greene, NLJ consultant editor and senior partner at Edwin Coe, says none of the parties likely to form the next government is likely to reverse the rise in court fees, but says there is a “glimmer of hope” that a new government might look again at the concept of hybrid damages-based agreements (DBAs).

Issue: 7649 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Oliver Banks

Slater Heelis—Oliver Banks

Manchester firm strengthens Court of Protection expertise with partner hire

Talbots Law—Sara Pickerin & Nicholas Playford

Talbots Law—Sara Pickerin & Nicholas Playford

Agricultural law team expands with senior director appointments

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023in NLJ this week
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
back-to-top-scroll