header-logo header-logo

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Sleeping on the job

Should workers be paid to sleep? David Regan reports

In the recent case of Burrow Down Support Services v Rossiter EAT/0592/07 the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has required payment of the minimum wage to “on call” workers able to sleep at work, despite the apparently express provision of the National Minimum Wage Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/584) to the contrary. The importation of European law may further widen the requirement to pay workers to sleep.

The Minimum Wage Regulations include deeming provisions which seem on their face to exempt employers from having to pay the minimum wage to workers sleeping in accommodation provided at work. However, the courts have applied a wide construction to the regulations, drawing on European law relating to the Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833). Workers permitted to sleep at work are increasingly being required to be paid the national minimum wage. The ramifications of this for residential and care homes, hotels, “on call” emergency workers, and possibly even homeworkers are significant.

Reg 15 of the Minimum Wage Regulations was amended in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll