header-logo header-logo

Sleeping on the job

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Should workers be paid to sleep? David Regan reports

In the recent case of Burrow Down Support Services v Rossiter EAT/0592/07 the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has required payment of the minimum wage to “on call” workers able to sleep at work, despite the apparently express provision of the National Minimum Wage Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/584) to the contrary. The importation of European law may further widen the requirement to pay workers to sleep.

The Minimum Wage Regulations include deeming provisions which seem on their face to exempt employers from having to pay the minimum wage to workers sleeping in accommodation provided at work. However, the courts have applied a wide construction to the regulations, drawing on European law relating to the Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833). Workers permitted to sleep at work are increasingly being required to be paid the national minimum wage. The ramifications of this for residential and care homes, hotels, “on call” emergency workers, and possibly even homeworkers are significant.

Reg 15 of the Minimum Wage Regulations was amended in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll