header-logo header-logo

The sleeping dragon

23 October 2014 / Dr Lars Mosesson
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail
monesson

What might the unintended consequences of repealing the Human Rights Act be? Lars Mosesson investigates

The Conservative party has indicated that its manifesto for the general election in 2015 will repeat their pledge to repeal “Labour’s” Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) and, possibly, to withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention). These proposals, and the campaign of attacks on judicial review and legal aid, appear to be motivated by a desire by ministers to be free to do what they want politically. Hence, it is timely to consider what the consequences would be for practitioners and others, if a new government were to seek to implement these proposals. Not only will it not be enough to repeal HRA 1998 for ministers to become free of human rights; but it might awaken a sleeping dragon.

The background to HRA 1998

The UK has chosen to be bound by the terms of the Convention since 1953, as a matter of international law. Over the years, all three main parties

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll