header-logo header-logo

02 February 2012
Issue: 7499 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Slater & Gordon acquires RJW

Buyout by world's first publicly listed law firm

Employment and personal injury firm Russell Jones & Walker (RJW) has been bought by Australia’s Slater & Gordon Lawyers, the world’s first publicly listed law firm.

The acquisition should be completed by April. RJW’s equity partners have taken “a substantial proportion” of their consideration as ASX shares in Slater & Gordon. Its principals and senior management have said they will remain in place for at least three years.

Slater & Gordon managing director Andrew Grech says the firm spent three years searching for the right opportunity in the UK and had looked at more than 30 firms. 

“We will be among the first to take advantage of a number of significant changes which are occurring in the legal profession in the UK,” he said, referring to the Legal Services Act 2007.

David Greene, partner at Edwin Coe and NLJ consultant editor, says: “The S & G template has been to take over firms in Australia fuelled by capital from the market. 

“The S & G business fits well with that of RJW. It’s a business with which they are very familiar, although the costs and precise modelling are likely to be quite different. 

“There is nothing new about firms being taken over but this is the first following the introduction of alternative business structures, which will make the regulatory process much easier. It could well be a one-off but it seems to suggest potential international consolidation of services.”

RJW chief executive officer Neil Kinsella says the move will give the firm the “resources and backing to develop and grow”.

“We want to become the largest and most trusted provider of personal legal services in the UK,” he says.

“Our commitment to making justice and legal services accessible and affordable to all remains, but our ability to do this increases.”

Issue: 7499 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll