header-logo header-logo

Shiner avoids prison for fraud

11 December 2024
Issue: 8098 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Fraud , Profession
printer mail-detail
Former solicitor Phil Shiner, previously principal of Public Interest Lawyers (PIL), has been sentenced to two years’ imprisonment suspended for two years, by Judge Christopher Hehir at Southwark Crown Court. 

Judge Hehir told Shiner: ‘You allowed your enthusiasm for your clients’ cases to get the better of your professional and personal judgment’.

Shiner pleaded guilty in September to three offences of fraud by failing to disclose information in 2007, namely failure to disclose that he obtained his Iraqi clients by using a fixer to engage in cold-calling and paid him referral fees. His firm secured nearly £200,000 in legal aid funds to bring judicial proceedings against the Ministry of Defence, later stayed due to the Al-Sweady Inquiry.

Issue: 8098 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Fraud , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll