header-logo header-logo

Separate businesses ban lifted

08 June 2015
Issue: 7656 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The prohibition on solicitors owning or having connections with outside businesses is to be abolished, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Board has decided.

The board voted last week to change the separate business rule, which prevents solicitors having links to separate businesses providing non-reserved legal services and therefore outside the remit of regulation. This means law firms will be able to compete on a level playing field with alternative business structures (ABSs) by owning, being owned by, actively participating in or developing links with separate businesses.

The board also voted to reform the rules on what activities law firms can undertake, which will make it easier for them to create one-stop shops for professional services. Instead, the regulator will focus on ensuring outcomes that protect the consumer.

The reforms were consulted on from November to February. They now need to be approved by the Legal Services Board and, if agreed, will become part of the Solicitors Handbook on 1 November.

David Greene, partner at Edwin Coe, says: “The policy lying behind the Separate Business Rule is to forestall confusion on the part of the consumer as to what part of a solicitor’s service is regulated.  

“We presume that another method will be prescribed to resolve that issue. For solicitors, the removal of the Separate Business restriction is undoubtedly good news. We have faced fierce competition for legal advice that falls outside reserved activities, such as will writing.  

“The removal of the restriction will go some way to redress the position; allowing solicitors to establish businesses offering ‘legal services’ that benefit from the branding of solicitor but fall outside the regulated environment.”      

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, says: “We are levelling the playing field for all types of law firms, encouraging innovation and growth, while ensuring appropriate consumer protection. 

“This follows on from changes we made last year to open up the market to different business models and ‘one-stop shop’ services. We are now looking into what more we should do to give solicitors even more flexibility in future.”

 

Issue: 7656 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll