header-logo header-logo

Sense & sensibility

01 July 2010 / Peter Wake
Issue: 7424 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Peter Wake applauds a common sense approach to liability

In the recent case of Esdale v Dover District Council [2010] EWCA Civ 409 the Court of Appeal delivered a helpful judgment in a simple personal injury claim; the facts of which will be familiar to local authorities across the country and their insurers.

The claimant was injured when she tripped and fell on a pathway forming the entrance to the block of flats where she lived. The council was the owner and occupier of both the block of flats and the pathway. The defect was a change in level in the path which the judge held to have measured between ¾ and one inch. The council inspected the path and adopted a general policy of repairing defects measuring more than ¾ inch. The path had been inspected on a number of occasions prior to the accident and the defect had not been regarded as requiring attention. The council’s inspector had reached this conclusion on the basis of a purely visual examination rather than

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll