header-logo header-logo

27 October 2020 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7908 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Secondary ticketing: the dos & donts

30350
Ticket touts, inflated prices & misleading information. Alec Samuels revisits the problematic area of resold tickets

In brief

  • In October 2018 the author provided a full review of resold tickets in ‘Secondary ticketing’, 168 NLJ 7812, p15 .Nearly two years on, he re-addresses the issue.

Ticket touts may be seen as either a social menace, damaging to society, or as a useful institution in a free society. Most promoters of public events strongly dislike the ticket touts and do all they can to forestall their activities.

Identifying and dealing with the touts and the purchasers of the original tickets is very difficult. The touts are elusive, often work in organised ‘gangs’, often online, will not inform on each other or anybody, and will try to evade service. Stopping the touts, bringing their activities to an end, can be particularly challenging.

McKay v All England Tennis Club [2020] EWCA Civ 695 paras [66-115], [2020] All ER (D) 51 (Jun) provides the classic example of what to do and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll