header-logo header-logo

11 October 2018 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7812 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Secondary ticketing

Ticket touts, inflated prices and misleading information. Alec Samuels looks at the problematic area of resold tickets

  • Covers ticket touts and sites such as Viagogo, law, regulation and enforcement.

Secondary ticketing, the resale of a recreational, sporting and cultural event ticket, is a basically lawful practice, but controversial and increasingly regulated by law. The original buyer may genuinely find that he will be unable to use the ticket, and perhaps the box office will not do a return and refund, so he offers it through eBay. The new buyer cannot obtain a ticket through the box office, they are sold out, so he is grateful for the chance to obtain a ticket through resale. Both the original buyer and the new buyer are happy.

Resale requirements

Unfortunately, there have been abuses. A company buys tickets in bulk, often electronically using ‘harvesting bots’, thereby creating a scarcity at the box office for the genuine fans. The company sells at a huge mark-up, and often sends the ticket at a late stage, and with inadequate information. Sometimes the ticket

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll