header-logo header-logo

Secondary ticketing

11 October 2018 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7812 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Ticket touts, inflated prices and misleading information. Alec Samuels looks at the problematic area of resold tickets

  • Covers ticket touts and sites such as Viagogo, law, regulation and enforcement.

Secondary ticketing, the resale of a recreational, sporting and cultural event ticket, is a basically lawful practice, but controversial and increasingly regulated by law. The original buyer may genuinely find that he will be unable to use the ticket, and perhaps the box office will not do a return and refund, so he offers it through eBay. The new buyer cannot obtain a ticket through the box office, they are sold out, so he is grateful for the chance to obtain a ticket through resale. Both the original buyer and the new buyer are happy.

Resale requirements

Unfortunately, there have been abuses. A company buys tickets in bulk, often electronically using ‘harvesting bots’, thereby creating a scarcity at the box office for the genuine fans. The company sells at a huge mark-up, and often sends the ticket at a late stage, and with inadequate information. Sometimes the ticket

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll