Safeguarding employee’s rights—the fight goes on

Controlling the abuse of TUPE, outlined by John McMullen

In brief

Daddy’s Dance Hall rule: employees protected from a detriment suffered as a result of a transfer of an undertaking and protected from having to waive any of their rights.
Power v Regent Security Services Ltd: the Daddy’s Dance Hall rule only applied to prevent variations by reason of the transfer which were to the detriment (as opposed to favourable variations) of the employee, under TUPE 1981.
TUPE 2006, reg 4(4): consolidating the Daddy’s Dance Hall rule.
Ferguson v Astrea Asset Management Ltd: when directors/employees improved their contractual benefits in view of a pending transfer these variations were either void or fell foul of the EU abuse of law principle.

How many times have your clients taken a transfer of an undertaking, where the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (TUPE) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246) apply, only to find salaries and benefits of transferring employees were suddenly inflated before the transfer, thereby passing these responsibilities

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Safeguarding employee’s rights—the fight goes on

Controlling the abuse of TUPE, outlined by John McMullen

In brief

Daddy’s Dance Hall rule: employees protected from a detriment suffered as a result of a transfer of an undertaking and protected from having to waive any of their rights.
Power v Regent Security Services Ltd: the Daddy’s Dance Hall rule only applied to prevent variations by reason of the transfer which were to the detriment (as opposed to favourable variations) of the employee, under TUPE 1981.
TUPE 2006, reg 4(4): consolidating the Daddy’s Dance Hall rule.
Ferguson v Astrea Asset Management Ltd: when directors/employees improved their contractual benefits in view of a pending transfer these variations were either void or fell foul of the EU abuse of law principle.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Surrogacy children caught in succession gap

A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’

NLJ this week: Online safety law at a crossroads

Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design

NLJ this week: Do Mandelson and Mountbatten-Windsor meet the misconduct bar?

Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle

NLJ this week: Supreme Court unlocks ‘lost years’ windfall for injured children

A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings

NLJ this week: Finality trumps freedom in arbitration showdown

A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996

Error message

Safeguarding employee’s rights—the fight goes on

In brief

In brief

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Switalskis—Grimsby

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury