header-logo header-logo

Safe house?

04 August 2011 / Malcolm Dowden , Joanna Bhatia
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

How can a tenant’s guarantor guarantee an assignee’s liability, ask Joanna Bhatia & Malcolm Dowden

In Good Harvest Partnership v Centaur Services [2010] EWHC 330 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 238 (Mar), the High Court confirmed that any guarantee by a tenant’s guarantor guaranteeing the tenant’s assignee is void. It falls foul of the anti-avoidance provisions in the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995, s 25 (LT(C)A 1995). The Court of Appeal, in K/S Victoria Street v House of Fraser (Stores Management) [2011] EWCA Civ 904, [2011] All ER (D) 262 (Jul) has supported the decision in Good Harvest, save in one respect, which offers a lifeline to landlords.

Good Harvest was controversial in light of the judge’s ruling that any guarantee actually given pursuant to an agreement to give one is void and not just the agreement itself. It overturned a significant strand of commentary on the anti-avoidance provisions, which distinguished between executory agreements (ie agreements that remained to be performed) and executed agreements. Counsel for the landlord in Good Harvest argued

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll