header-logo header-logo

Saatchi's Medical Innovation Bill may impact on patient safety

27 October 2014
Issue: 7628 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Personal injury lawyers have warned Lord Saatchi’s Medical Innovation Bill could drive vulnerable patients into the hands of “maverick” doctors.

Lord Saatchi’s bill would give legal protection to doctors seeking to try alternative procedures or treatments for cancer. It goes to committee stage in the House of Lords next week.

However, John Spencer, president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (Apil) said that, contrary to popular perception, the Bill would not just apply to “dying people who are willing to give anything a chance". 

“In fact, the Bill will affect all patients who, in their vulnerability, may be tempted to take risks at the hands of maverick doctors who are over-ambitious in their drive to make names for themselves. Lord Saatchi’s amendments to the Bill do not address concerns about patient safety raised by doctors, patient groups, and medical research organisations. 

“Under the Bill, a doctor needs to only ‘obtain the views’ of an ‘appropriately qualified doctor’ before undertaking an innovative treatment.

"Crucially, he would not have to act on those views, and we still don’t know what an ‘appropriately qualified doctor’ is.”

Spencer said he had heard of no cases of a doctor being sued for using an innovative treatment, and that if some doctors were holding back from certain treatments due to a misunderstanding of the law then that could be could by “an effort to educate, not legislate”.

 

Issue: 7628 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll