header-logo header-logo

24 June 2016 / Olivia Staines
Issue: 7704 / Categories: Features , Profession , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-detail

Ruling arbitration

nlj_7704_ciarb3

Olivia Staines discusses the main features of CIArb’s new Arbitration Rules

The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators’ (CIArb) new Arbitration Rules, which came into effect on 1 December 2015, are very different from most other institutional rules. Hailed as the bearers of an “administration lite” service, they comprise input from the Institute’s 37 branches as well as 60 members of its international teaching faculty.

Why did CIArb decide to produce a new set of Arbitration Rules?

CIArb’s previous set of Rules were last revised in 2000 and crucially, they only applied to domestic arbitrations under the English Arbitration Act 1996. In order to resonate with the words in our Royal Charter and Bye-laws, which state that we are here to “promote and facilitate worldwide the determination of disputes by arbitration”, we decided to produce a new set of Rules in 2015 which could be applied internationally and cater to the ever-changing arbitration landscape.

Who drafted the new Rules?

A special sub-committee was gathered to produce the first draft of the new Rules. After review and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll