header-logo header-logo

12 September 2023
Issue: 8040 / Categories: Legal News , Rule of law , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Rule of law has been ‘undermined’

JUSTICE report identifies slate of government attacks on the rule of law

The rule of law has ‘regressed significantly on multiple fronts’ in the UK, according to a devastating report by law and rights charity JUSTICE.

‘There are multiple reasons why we have reached the parlous state we are in,’ Fiona Rutherford, chief executive of JUSTICE, said.

‘Each one viewed in isolation does not amount to the wholesale negation of the rule of law—but taken together they create a picture suggesting that the rule of law is being incrementally undermined. We believe we have reached a tipping point and are determined to highlight a route back.’

JUSTICE’s 105-page report, ‘The state we’re in: addressing threats & challenges to the rule of law’, published this week, called on the government to stop using ‘inflammatory language’ such as referring to ‘unelected judiciary’.

The report found the process of lawmaking has become less transparent, less accountable, less inclusive and less democratic in the past decade, particularly in the past five years.

Public consultations, for example, were often poorly conducted, if at all. The report gives the examples of the Illegal Migration Act 2023, for which there was no public consultation or pre-legislative scrutiny, and the Bill of Rights Bill consultation, which was sidelined despite 90% of the 12,000 responses received opposing the reforms.

The report found a growing legislative disregard for human rights, for example, it noted the chilling effect of the Public Order Act 2023 on our rights to freedom of thought, expression and peaceful assembly. The government was increasingly using ‘Henry VIII’ powers to allow ministers to avoid or minimise legislative scrutiny by changing laws via statutory instrument. Meanwhile, individuals seeking to enforce or defend their rights were hampered by legal aid cuts and lengthy case backlogs.

JUSTICE called on the government to make ‘skeleton legislation’ an exception not a convenience, reduce its use of ‘Henry VIII’ powers, and make equality impact assessments a mandatory part of the legislative process.

It recommended wholesale repeal of several pieces of legislation passed since 2019, including Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Act 2021, the Public Order Act 2023 and the Illegal Migration Act 2023.
Issue: 8040 / Categories: Legal News , Rule of law , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll