header-logo header-logo

Room for improvement

07 September 2012 / Karl Tonks
Issue: 7528 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Plans to help sick & dying workers must go further, says Karl Tonks

Plans for a fund of last resort to compensate workers with asbestos-related lung cancer mesothelioma are a significant step in the right direction.

But while the fund will provide much needed redress to many sick and dying workers, the proposals still fall short of ensuring that all innocent victims of industrial disease are compensated properly.

The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL)  has campaigned for more than a decade for the introduction of a workplace fund of last resort, also known as an employers’ liability insurance bureau.

Such a fund is needed because the onset of symptoms for long-tail diseases, such as mesothelioma, can occur decades after a worker has inhaled asbestos fibres. Because of the historic nature of these claims, it can be impossible for a victim to trace his employer, and his employer’s insurer, to bring a claim.

Consistently argued

APIL has consistently argued that insurers should not be allowed to dodge their responsibility of paying compensation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll