header-logo header-logo

20 March 2019
Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Rogue lawyer warning

An unqualified lawyer has been held professionally negligent and ordered to pay his client £263,759 damages, plus £73,200 costs.

The High Court ruled that George Rusz and his firm Troy Lucas held themselves out as legal advisers to their client Paul Wright and therefore must be judged by the standard of a competent legal adviser. Wright suffered serious injuries from a negligent operation that left three plastic bags inside his body. Rusz ran his clinical negligence case, valuing the claim first at £1.1m then just under £3m, but without any supporting evidence.

Wright won his basic claim but was left with £73,200 costs against him.

Emma Jones, partner at Leigh Day, who acted for Wright in the professional negligence claim, said: ‘This is the first case on this issue since the ruling in Freeman v Marshall & Co [1966].’ She warned there has been ‘an increase in unregulated individuals who advertise their services’. 

Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Professional negligence
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll