header-logo header-logo

04 November 2010 / Joseph Ollech , Adam Rosenthal
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

The road to recovery

Adam Rosenthal & Joseph Ollech report on elephant traps, technical gymnastics & compliance

In Woodar Investment Development Limited v Wimpey Construction UK Limited [1980] 1 WLR 277, a contract for the sale of development land contained a special condition entitling the purchaser to terminate the contract if, prior to the completion date, the property to be sold became subject to compulsory purchase by an acquiring authority. In due course, the purchasers gave such a notice. The vendors disputed it and it was found that the notice was invalid. However, the vendors then purported to accept the purchasers’ repudiatory breach of contract and sue for damages. The House of Lords (by a 3:2 majority) held that the purchasers, in serving an invalid notice of termination, were not manifesting the intention not to perform the contract and therefore the invalid notice of rescission was not, itself, a repudiatory breach of contract.

The principle that an attempt to terminate a contract, relying on the very terms of the contract, if found to be wrongful

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll