header-logo header-logo

23 March 2018 / Ellis Pugh , Giselle Davies , Giselle Davies
Issue: 7786 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail

Risk management: avoiding the nuclear option

Giselle Davies & Ellis Pugh discuss how to handle liabilities outside your control

  • Defined benefit pension schemes can risk creating a funding deficit.
  • Avoiding insolvency is paramount.
  • Robust risk management is required to manage the issue.

While hidden liabilities come in all sorts of shapes and sizes, the fact that the sector is currently sitting on a very substantial pensions liability has been known for some time. A recent paper indicates that the top 40 charities in England and Wales have pension liabilities totaling £7bn. Clearly this is a problem, particularly where a charity’s pension liability compares unfavourably to its unrestricted reserve funds or annual income (the Hymans Robertson report suggests that for the 40 charities concerned the £7bn compares with £38bn of reserves and £12bn annual income respectively). For an individual charity, the comparison may be significantly less favourable.

Funding deficits: a ticking time bomb

It is defined benefit pension schemes (DBS), sometimes referred to as ‘final salary pensions’, which carry the risk of a funding deficit and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll