header-logo header-logo

24 July 2008 / Penny Cooper
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

The right protocol?

Penny Cooper considers the implications of the Public Law Outline

On 1 April 2008 the Public Law Outline (The PLO) Guide to Case Management in Public Law Proceedings replaced The Protocol for Judicial Case Management in Public Law Children Act Cases. On the same date the Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) introduced revised statutory guidance for care and supervision order proceedings (“Court Orders” of the Children Act guidance under s 7 of the Local Authority Social Services Act 1970) and a new practice direction for the use and instruction of experts in family proceedings relating to children. These three documents are designed to complement each other and can be found at www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/careproceedings.htm.

What's Behind the PLO?

The PLO needs to be seen in the context of the last 17 years; in October 1991 the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) came into force, bringing a much greater emphasis on trying to keep families together, proactive case management by the courts and avoiding delay in care proceedings. It was envisaged that under ChA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll