header-logo header-logo

11 June 2013
Issue: 7564 / Categories: Legal News , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

RICS launches property expert witness register

RICS has launched an accredited scheme for expert witnesses in the construction and property sectors.

The scheme is in response to the Jackson reforms and the decision in Jones v Kaney, where the Supreme Court held that experts could be sued for negligence. Lord Justice Jackson’s reforms to civil litigation costs, which took effect in April, place a higher emphasis on the quality and value for money of experts.

As part of the scheme, experts will undergo training and will be assessed and regulated by the scheme, Expert Witness Accreditation Service (EWAS). Experts in this sector have not previously been subject to professional regulation.

Martin Burns, head of ADR research and development at RICS, said the Jackson reforms and Jones had “placed greater emphasis on the quality of expert witnesses, and the need for them to provide value for money”.

Sue Ryan, partner at Wragge & Co, said: “If the scheme expands the field of credible expert witnesses and raises standards through reports being more concise and restricted to relevant matters within the expert’s area of specialism, then the change can only be positive. It will lead to a reduction in the overall cost of expert evidence in litigation/arbitration, in keeping with the Jackson cost reforms.”

Issue: 7564 / Categories: Legal News , Expert Witness
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll