header-logo header-logo

Restrictive covenants

22 October 2009 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7390 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Malcolm Dowden unravels the complexities of enforcing restrictive covenants in building schemes

Building schemes arise where land has been developed by being laid out in plots and then sold to different buyers. Each buyer enters into restrictive covenants with the common seller restricting the use of the particular plot for the benefit of the estate generally.

Their purpose is to preserve the value of the estate and to prevent, for instance, business use in a residential area. The owner for the time being of each plot is bound by the scheme and he can enforce its rules against all other owners governed by the scheme. Restrictive covenants contained within the scheme are also enforceable by owners of sub-divisions of land within the scheme (Brunner v Greenslade [1970] 3 All ER 833).

A building scheme requires: an intention to impose mutually enforceable restrictions in the interest of all the buyers and their successors; and a clearly defined area affected by the scheme, and known to the buyers.

A building scheme constitutes a local law, binding the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll