header-logo header-logo

Resolution condemns "travesty" in family justice system

16 July 2015
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Family lawyers’ group Resolution has slated the Justice Secretary’s “bullish and unapologetic” response to a critical Justice Committee report on the legal aid cuts.

Justice Secretary Michael Gove said he did not accept the Justice Committee’s findings that the Ministry had “largely failed to achieve [its] wider objectives for reform beyond achieving savings”, in his response to the Committee’s report into the impact of the changes to civil legal aid under Part 1 of LASPO (Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act), published this week.

Instead, “unnecessary and adversarial litigation at public expense [had] been reduced”, he said, while funding had been targeted at those most in need. The reforms had been “expressly designed to make sure that we meet our legal commitments”, he said, and the exceptional case funding scheme made sure funding would continue to be made available “where its absence would breach or would risk breaching” European Convention rights or EU law.

However, Resolution chairman Jo Edwards hit back: “While there have been some welcome concessions recently, such as widening the domestic violence evidence requirements, much more needs to be done, quickly, to protect access to justice for the vulnerable.

“We strongly advocate, at the very least, that the government take heed of the committee’s recommendation that legislation be drafted to protect vulnerable people from being cross-examined by the person who abused them, which is tantamount to a perpetuation of the abuse.

“That this situation, long legislated against in the criminal courts, should continue to exist in our family justice system is a travesty.”

Issue: 7661 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll