header-logo header-logo

Reporting the family courts

21 March 2025 / Alexandra Hirst
Issue: 8109 / Categories: Features , Profession , Family
printer mail-detail
211925
A route to justice or a concern for clients? Alexandra Hirst weighs up the benefits & risks of the transparency pilot scheme
  • The year-long transparency pilot scheme allows the press greater access to the family courts.
  • The biggest challenge will be establishing what reporters can report, based on what they have heard and read at the hearings they attend.
  • Clients may well be concerned about personal information being reported, which could inhibit and censor their evidence. However, the motivations behind the scheme are wholly positive.

The transparency pilot scheme has been in place in all financial remedy proceedings across the country since the end of January 2025, and it will run for a year.

Proponents of the scheme are seeking to improve the lack of public access to, and awareness of, what takes place in the family law courts and how judges come to decisions relating to children and families. There is a concern, following decisions in high-profile public law cases, that decisions are being made behind closed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll