header-logo header-logo

15 November 2023
Issue: 8049 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-detail

Report questions quality of magistrates’ decision-making

Poor decision-making in the magistrates’ courts is causing people to be remanded in custody unnecessarily, a report by JUSTICE suggests

The report, ‘Remand decision-making in the magistrates’ courtRemand decision-making in the magistrates’ court’, published last week, said the number of people on remand in custody awaiting trial, rather than released on bail, has risen in recent years. In September 2022, it was at its highest in 50 years.

In March 2023, the remand population stood at 14,591, a 14% increase from last year, and a 45% increase from March 2020.

This increase places strain on existing resources, such as cell capacity and educational provision, as well as putting prisoners on remand at risk of losing employment, accommodation and ties with support systems. Moreover, individuals from Black and racialised backgrounds are disproportionately impacted.

However, JUSTICE’s research using data from 742 hearings uncovered that the processes for determining bail do not appear to be properly followed in the magistrates’ courts. JUSTICE found that decision makers rarely provided reasons for their decisions, despite legislative requirements to do so. There were disparities in outcomes, particularly for non-White defendants, foreign national defendants, defendants appearing via video-link and in a secure dock, and defendants lacking representation.

The report noted that ‘such disparities suggest biased decision-making driven by perceptions of risk, likely exacerbated by a lack of diversity amongst decision makers’. However, the lack of data available means further research will be required to establish the extent of this issue. JUSTICE has called on the government to undertake further research.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘It is extremely concerning that the JUSTICE report suggests that the law is not being properly applied.

‘The research demonstrates the importance of defendants being represented from the very start of their case and ensuring they have full knowledge of the potentially life-changing decisions that are taking place.’

Issue: 8049 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll