header-logo header-logo

Remodelling the Bar

05 November 2009 / Timothy Dutton KC
Issue: 7392 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Timothy Dutton QC considers the impact of the Legal Services Act on the independent Bar

Barristers tend to predict the demise of the independent or “Referral Bar” with monotonous regularity, only to be proved wrong at each turn.In the early 1990s the prediction was made with real anguish as the leaders of the profession saw exclusive rights of audience removed in the higher courts, where barristers had for centuries enjoyed a monopoly.

Demise came there none: the Bar responded by improving its standards of training, maintaining high standards of regulation with comparatively low levels of complaint and a good complaints record, with occasional praise coming from the Legal Services Ombudsman. 

What then will be the effect of the Legal Services Act 2007?  True to form there are those who predict Armageddon. But there are others who welcome the opportunities which the Act is said to provide. There are two issues which face the Bar:

How its regulator the Bar Standards Board (BSB) should respond to the Act. Should it permit partnerships of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll