header-logo header-logo

Rejecting Carter

26 June 2008 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Professor Michael Zander assesses the 24 main responses to the Gage working group's consultation paper on sentencing

The Sentencing Working Group, chaired by Lord Justice Gage, is currently considering two main proposals: adoption of an American-style grid system that would drastically restrict judicial discretion and establishment of a Sentencing Commission that could be required to tailor sentencing guidelines to fit the size of the prison estate.

Lord Carter, in his report, Securing the Future-Proposals for the Efficient and Sustainable Use of Custody in England and Wales, December 2007 (see NLJ, 1 February 2008, p 162), recommended that these two ideas be considered by a working party which should report “by summer 2008”. (The working group, on a seriously tight schedule, aims to report early in July.)

The working group's consultation paper issued on 31 March called for responses by 2 June. When the secretariat declared the consultation closed, it was stated that there had been 228 responses. This count is, however, misleading since a high proportion were effectively duplicates. Thus, for instance,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll