header-logo header-logo

08 May 2008
Issue: 7320 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Regulator told to define LDP business models

News

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) must define what it means by “business models” for legal disciplinary practices (LDPs) or face possible legal challenges, the College of Law’s legal services policy institute warns. Professor Stephen Mayson, director of the institute, which was set up in 2006 in the aftermath of the Clementi and Carter reviews, says a definition is urgently needed before new LDPs are formed under the Legal Services Act 2007 in 2009.

 

He says:

“As the marketplace for legal services changes in the wake of competition, there is increasing talk about appropriate business models for the new landscape. It is apparent, however, that although the same term—business model—is being used, it is not necessarily being used in the same way by everyone.”

 

The proposed LDP regulations would allow the SRA to attach a condition to an LDP’s recognition on the basis that such a condition is necessary in the public interest to “limit, halt or prevent a risk to clients, third parties or the public” arising from the firm’s business model (or one it is likely to adopt).

 

Mayson says:

“Neither law firms nor the SRA has a working definition of business models but the SRA is planning to use the concept in LDP regulations. So how can either be sure what the other is proposing? There is a real risk that the regulator and regulated will end up at crosspurposes— or even worse, judicial review.”

 

An SRA spokesman says:

“The rules provide for internal appeals and the statute provides for an appeal to the High Court, so there would be no need for a judicial review. Regarding the definition of business models, the SRA would almost certainly allow any that are legal and do not present risks to clients and the public.”

 

The institute has drawn up its own definition, which is published in a working paper, Business Models in Legal Services:

“A business model is an articulation of a firm’s core logic for creating and capturing value through its investments in and use of resources.”

 

The paper says law firms should consider whether their firm is one business with strategic business units requiring one business model with multiple elements, or a number of discrete businesses each requiring its own business model. For each business model, four core elements must be identified: the value creation elements, the value capture elements, the investment element and the resources element.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll