header-logo header-logo

04 June 2025
Issue: 8119 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Legal services , Risk management
printer mail-detail

Regulator sanctioned for Axiom Ince failings

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has been given 12 months to improve its safeguarding of risk, intervention and client money, under binding directions issued in response to the Axiom Ince scandal

It must provide quarterly written reports on progress to the Legal Services Board (LSB), and commission independent external auditors within 12 months to evaluate its compliance and identify any other weaknesses.

Catherine Brown, interim chair of the LSB, said: ‘The severity of what happened at Axiom Ince—with £60m in client money missing and 1,400 people losing their jobs—demanded decisive action, and we welcome the SRA’s constructive engagement with us during this statutory process.

‘The directions we've issued are designed to protect the public and better ensure client funds are properly safeguarded.’

The directions, which are binding under the Legal Services Act 2008, require the SRA to ‘revise its regulatory arrangements and guidance to… protect consumers and the public from potential harm arising from a single individual holding more than one role in a firm or other authorised body eg owner, manager, compliance officer for legal practice, compliance officer for finance and administration, and money laundering compliance officer’.

Axiom Ince grew rapidly through a series of mergers and acquisitions before being closed by the SRA in October 2023. The firm’s owner held multiple compliance roles.

The SRA must also ‘ensure firms have effective safeguards to protect client money’ and ‘put in place measures to enable more effective risk-based scrutiny of firms undergoing sale, merger or acquisition’.

The SRA is due to make a decision before the end of this year on whether it will go ahead with its proposals to stop firms handling client money.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘We have been working over the past months with the LSB on our plan to address and implement its directions.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll