header-logo header-logo

20 February 2026 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 8150 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Regulating the short let

242979
Andrew Francis tells some cautionary tales of restrictive covenants used for holiday & other short-term lettings
  • This article examines problems arising from restrictive covenants on short-term lets.
  • It examines the case law in relation to breach, which show the importance of considering the covenants affecting the title, either at the pre-contract stage, or post purchase where a change of use is contemplated.

Let us start with three examples.

No 1: Your client has instructed you to act on the purchase of the freehold title to a house by the sea. This is subject to a restrictive covenant providing that the property is ‘only to be used as a private dwelling house’. There is also a ‘no nuisance or annoyance’ covenant. Your client has told you that it intends to use the house for short-term/Airbnb letting during the holiday season.

No 2: Your client has instructed you to act on the purchase of a leasehold residential flat in central London. This is subject to tenant’s covenants providing that the property is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll