header-logo header-logo

Regulating the referral fees ban

13 September 2012
Issue: 7529 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

SRA will not provide detailed rules on referral fee ban

Solicitors’ demands for detailed rules to help them comply with the forthcoming ban on referral fees in personal injury cases will not be met, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has confirmed.

The referral fees ban is due to come into force next April, as part of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012. The government is introducing it in response to suggestions that referral fees are encouraging higher numbers of claims and therefore higher insurance premiums.

The SRA intends to use an “outcomes-focused approach” to regulate the ban, which will allow it “to look at the substance of an arrangement, rather than just its form, and focus on those arrangements that pose a real risk to the public interest”.

However, responses to the SRA’s June discussion paper included concerns that the Law Society previously found it difficult to regulate the payment of referral fees and called for “clear guidance” on the ban.

Having published its analysis of the responses last week, the SRA says: “It is not the function of the SRA to provide regulated persons with ‘safe harbour’ guidance.

“However, given the interest in this issue, it is likely that the SRA will publish further guidance setting out our legal interpretation of what is caught by the Act. Our preliminary view is that the definition within the Act is fairly wide-ranging.”

It warns that joint marketing and advertising arrangements are “vulnerable to being in breach”, and says solicitors had raised “particular concerns” about these. It says it will look at the issue “so as to ensure that a clear and consistent message is delivered in the forthcoming months”.

Issue: 7529 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
back-to-top-scroll