header-logo header-logo

Stamp of authority for will-writers

20 February 2013
Issue: 7549 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

But estate administration excluded from statutory regulation

Moves to make will-writing a reserved activity do not go far enough to protect the public from fraud and incompetence, say will-writers.

Consumers often suffer problems such as high pressure sales tactics and poorly drafted wills, and problems usually only come to light after someone has died. By then, it is very difficult to put matters right.

The Legal Services Board (LSB) recommended to the Lord Chancellor last week that will-writing should become a reserved (or regulated) activity. However, the recommendation does not extend to estate administration.

The Society of Will Writers said it was “disappointed” as it had “long identified and reported the fact that many of the cases identified as poor wills was due more to poor or fraudulent estate administration than to the actual quality of the will”. It called on the LSB to “look again” at estate administration.

The Institute of Professional Willwriters (IPW), which has campaigned for more than 20 years for will-writing to be regulated, launched a voluntary code of practice for will-writers in 2010, but only a minority of practitioners joined the scheme.

It warned in a statement that omitting estate administration, which involved handling a deceased person’s money and assets, posed a “huge risk” to consumers since sums often amounting to hundreds of thousands of pounds were “susceptible to loss due to fraud or theft” during the process.

Alan Kershaw, chair of ILEX professional standards, says: “It is likely that public and consumer protection will be compromised if the result is that less competent and professional providers shift to estate administration—the part of the process which is most profitable, and where the need for client protection measures is greatest.” 

In its announcement, the LSB said it had “considered carefully the reported risk of fraud in estate administration” but concluded that “statutory regulation would not be effective in preventing what amounts to criminal behaviour”.

Writing for this week’s NLJ, Paul Sharpe, the Chairman of IPW says: “I know many, many
will-writing professionals who are desperate for the services that they provide to become regulated. Not only will that see off the cowboys and the incompetent but it will enable them to stand out in the market with the credibility that they deserve.”

Issue: 7549 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll