header-logo header-logo

08 November 2023
Issue: 8048 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

Reforms for landlords, renters & homeowners

Lawyers have given a cautious welcome to the inclusion in the King’s Speech of legislation to help leaseholders, with some warning reform will be complex and difficult while others predict little will change

Setting out the government’s legislative priorities for the next 12 months, King Charles announced a Leasehold and Freehold Bill to ban the creation of new leasehold houses and make it cheaper and easier for more leaseholders to: extend their lease, with a standard term of 990 years and zero ground rent for both houses and flats; buy their freehold; and take over management of their building. The rights will apply to leaseholders in buildings with up to 50% non-residential floorspace (such as flats above shops) and leaseholders will no longer have to wait two years before applying.

A Renters (Reform) Bill will also be introduced, abolishing ‘no-fault evictions’, adding mandatory grounds for possession including that the landlord wishes to sell the property or move a family member in, and providing for eviction within two weeks for a breach of the tenancy agreement or damage to the property. The Bill provides for a Private Rented Sector Ombudsman with binding powers to resolve tenancy disputes.

However, Jeremy Raj, head of residential property at Irwin Mitchell, said none of the proposals ‘deal with the fundamental issues troubling the housing market, such as lack of supply, uncertainty regarding future regulation, unsuitable stock for our environmental ambitions and our population profile, and of course the affordability crisis’. Moreover, Raj said the leasehold bill ‘disappoints those of us who have been hoping for many years now for a co-ordinated and fundamental overhaul of the areas that have let leasehold down as a system of tenure’.

Mark Chick, director of the Association of Leasehold Enfranchisement Practitioners and partner at Bishop & Sewell, said the leasehold bill could be good news or ‘could fuel confusion, cost and controversy’.

Chick said extending leases to 990 years was an ‘easy win’, and highlighted his view that removing leasehold for new flats isn’t possible ‘until the work necessary to make the existing system of commonhold fit for purpose is complete’. 

Issue: 8048 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll