header-logo header-logo

Redress scheme

26 June 2008
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Property
printer mail-detail

In brief

The new estate agents redress scheme from the Estate Agents Company Limited has been approved by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT). With the approval of a redress scheme under the Consumer Estate Agents and Redress Act 2007, the secretary of state for business enterprise and regulatory reform can now require all estate agents dealing with residential property in the UK to join an approved scheme from October 2008. The OFT is considering two other applications to operate estate agents redress schemes and will announce decisions on these soon. Once it becomes compulsory for agents to join an approved scheme, buyers and sellers of residential property will be able to refer complaints concerning members of the scheme to an ombudsman who can make a range of awards, including requiring a member to pay compensation.

Issue: 7327 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll